3 replies [Last post]
t-bone_two
t-bone_two's picture
Offline
Enthusiast
Los Angeles
Last seen: 5 years 40 weeks ago
Los Angeles
Timezone: GMT-6
Joined: 2009-09-26
Posts: 209
Points: 268

I got some feedback today. And I am going back to the drawing board.

Do you think the attached track listing is more productive than here?

Original Track Listing

AttachmentSize
track_listing.jpg248.67 KB
Deuce
Deuce's picture
Offline
Guru
Somewhere, USA
Last seen: 4 years 9 weeks ago
Somewhere, USA
Timezone: GMT-5
Joined: 2005-11-20
Posts: 4424
Points: 1843

From your link - why is all

From your link - why is all that data inside of an h3 tag?
Also, your track lists should be just that, a list.

all ยป http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/all

Google isn't a bunch of guys reading and grading web sites, it's more like a bunch of monkeys sniffing food and putting the good bananas at the top. -Triumph

CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 6 years 1 week ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

Deuce wrote: From your link -

Deuce wrote:

From your link - why is all that data inside of an h3 tag?
Also, your track lists should be just that, a list.

Thats exactly what I said in his other thread.

CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 6 years 1 week ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

t-bone_two wrote: Do you

t-bone_two wrote:

Do you think the attached track listing is more productive than here?

I like this much more! May need some line-height to make it more readable.