4 replies [Last post]
CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 4 years 9 weeks ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

Andy Clarke gives us his first impression on Typekit. Then there is talk about the text rendering differences of modern browsers here.

gary.turner
gary.turner's picture
Offline
Moderator
Dallas
Last seen: 6 hours 1 min ago
Dallas
Timezone: GMT-6
Joined: 2004-06-25
Posts: 9743
Points: 3822

Am not a fan

I have no doubt this might be a very nice service, but I have serious reservations about housing core materials on sites not in my control.

If we are to export fonts to the client, those fonts should be ones we own and control. If there are licensing issues, then we need to deal with them. The gods know there are tens of thousands of fonts that are free of onerous licensing provisions. For any popular font face, there is a least one well made emulation that may not be exquisite enough for hi-rez print, but is more than adequate for web resolution.

cheers,

gary

If your web page is as clever as you can make it, it's probably too clever for you to debug or maintain.

CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 4 years 9 weeks ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

yeah, there are still

yeah, there are still complications that need to get worked out.

Hugo
Hugo's picture
Offline
Moderator
London
Last seen: 4 years 44 weeks ago
London
Joined: 2004-06-06
Posts: 15668
Points: 2806

We have commented on this

We have commented on this venture before I think. I don't really see what has changed or is new to discuss.

I am - as stated last time - extremely sceptical about this whole venture, nothing I read changes this opinion at the moment. the negative points far outweigh the positives, which after all - and I would love to have pretty fonts to use - is not a crucial aspect to the effectiveness of a web page.

In the link if one reads the comments you get an impression of the problems inherent in this approach that the sceptics raise - unfortunately - some very valid points are made.

I also have a wee issue with Clarks article which doesn't appear to really provide any substance and has the feel of hype to me (I assume he has a vested interest? He seems to be a beta tester, is anyone else? Can I see some site examples of typekit in action?). Hype is something I run a mile from, that and the fact I can find so little real information on this service, no real hard detail yet it supposedly launches in a few months or less.

The whole issue of CDN is one that makes me fairly nervous due to it's inherently massive point of failure. We were looking into Amazon services as we have to process and store huge amounts of images that will only go on increasing eventually drowning our servers, so outsourcing the storage and delivery of those files on servers that we can grow as demand dictates is attractive, yet it makes me nervous to be reliant on this third party for something so critical; likewise I simply don't need clients ringing up moaning at me that their pretty site isn't looking so pretty, what's happened to their nice site? all because Typekits servers are running slow or have failed or even worse the service has proved to be non viable and is closed down after 18 months meaning that I now have to contact each client and explain why their site is not going to look so nice and that there isn't a solution to this that we can offer. That is not a scenario that I ever intend on exposing myself or the business to, clients do not get this sort of thing and simply blame you for the situation.

Here are few more comments:

http://astheria.com/design/typekit-another-layer-of-complexity

One further aspect I'm not keen on is of having to pay for this service, that simply doesn't feel right, regardless of the fact that font foundries need their licensing fee.

Before you make your first post it is vital that you READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please post ALL your code - both CSS & HTML - in [code] tags
Please validate and ensure you have included a full Doctype before posting.
Why validate? Read Me

Tyssen
Tyssen's picture
Offline
Moderator
Brisbane
Last seen: 5 years 4 weeks ago
Brisbane
Timezone: GMT+10
Joined: 2004-05-01
Posts: 8201
Points: 1386

Typekit's not going to be

Typekit's not going to be the only player in this area:

http://fontdeck.com/
http://kernest.com/
http://www.typotheque.com/news/web_font_service_preview

There's also a lot of talk about this proposal recently too. And this one from Ascender.

How to get help
Post a link. If you can't post a link, jsFiddle it.
My blog | My older articles | CSS Reference