5 replies [Last post]
Tony
Tony's picture
Offline
Moderator
Brisbane
Last seen: 3 weeks 3 days ago
Brisbane
Timezone: GMT+10
Joined: 2003-03-12
Posts: 5344
Points: 2965

The Last Call period ends on 1 October 2009.
Have your say.
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/

Hugo
Hugo's picture
Offline
Moderator
London
Last seen: 8 years 20 weeks ago
London
Joined: 2004-06-06
Posts: 15668
Points: 2806

I'm sure they can come up

I'm sure they can come up with the best implementation of the property, how long do they really need to spec this out, it's been years that CSS3 has been in development. Sorry to sound really cynical here but but something needs to change drastically in the way that these bodies approach real world implementation, and yes I'm aware of the nature and problems faced.

Given that IE8 has actually got no support for CSS3 (I am not counting what they claim as support when in actual fact all they support are the properties they themselves created and have always? supported in their browsers) is there any point in caring that much? This will the same as when I first learnt about attribute selectors and jumped for joy before falling back despondent when I realised there was little point using them, I don't see MS rushing out a new browser any time soon? I would have thought that IE8 will be much like IE6 around for years, dragging back the advance of our craft- despite it's none too bad support for Standards.

Before you make your first post it is vital that you READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please post ALL your code - both CSS & HTML - in [code] tags
Please validate and ensure you have included a full Doctype before posting.
Why validate? Read Me

gary.turner
gary.turner's picture
Offline
Moderator
Dallas
Last seen: 2 years 13 weeks ago
Dallas
Timezone: GMT-6
Joined: 2004-06-25
Posts: 9776
Points: 3858

I've played with these

I've played with these properties in FF and Safari (or was it Opera?), and really had good impressions. Like Hugo, though, it is depressing to realize they are worthless due to IE.

cheers,

gary

If your web page is as clever as you can make it, it's probably too clever for you to debug or maintain.

CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 7 years 38 weeks ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

We need to start a web wide

We need to start a web wide movement to boycott IE. start building everything for compliant browsers. If they come to the site with IE, we throw up a screen that makes them download a new browser. This is the only way IE will ever change. Andy Clarke and others feel the same way. We need to start somewhere if we ever expect change. Sure, this will piss some folks off, but they'll get over it.

I've implemented this on my Pixel Behavior site.

Deuce
Deuce's picture
Offline
Guru
Somewhere, USA
Last seen: 5 years 46 weeks ago
Somewhere, USA
Timezone: GMT-5
Joined: 2005-11-20
Posts: 4424
Points: 1843

Cupid - as much as I

Cupid - as much as I personally agree with that statement, it's hard to tell a client that they should choose to drive away over 40% of their traffic because the person isn't using a stands compliant browser.

Would you, personally, be willing to take a 40% cut in your annual profits so that you can try to make a difference?
Those 40% will just go to the next site they find that offers the same product.

all ยป http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/all

Google isn't a bunch of guys reading and grading web sites, it's more like a bunch of monkeys sniffing food and putting the good bananas at the top. -Triumph

CupidsToejam
CupidsToejam's picture
Offline
Guru
Florida
Last seen: 7 years 38 weeks ago
Florida
Timezone: GMT-4
Joined: 2008-08-15
Posts: 2637
Points: 1556

i never said it realistic.

i never said it realistic.