3 replies [Last post]
imack
Offline
Regular
Oslo
Last seen: 17 years 10 weeks ago
Oslo
Timezone: GMT+2
Joined: 2004-09-15
Posts: 13
Points: 0

I've had trouble with this page before, but now there's a new problem. It's Explorer again, and I need to get this fixed before monday... (deadlines anone?)

This page
http://www.tkc.no/

Shows perfect in all browsers. But not Explorer. To top it, different Explorers show the same mistake in different ways. Even IE5.2 and IE5.2.3/Mac does it different. IE5 and 6/Win to offcourse.

Problem:
-The image to the right is shiftet to far to the right (IE5.2/Mac).
-The thumbnails on the left dissapears under the right image (IE5.2.3/Mac)
-The image to the right is put below the thumbnails, screwing up the whole layout (IE6/Win).

(Use firefox, mozilla, netscape, opera or safari to see how it's supposed to be.)

imack
Offline
Regular
Oslo
Last seen: 17 years 10 weeks ago
Oslo
Timezone: GMT+2
Joined: 2004-09-15
Posts: 13
Points: 0

Bad Explorer. Again.

I've now located the error more presisly. It seems as the <div> I use for holding the thumbnails has a huge margin-left. But I haven't told it to. Still looking for a fix.

Hugo
Hugo's picture
Offline
Moderator
London
Last seen: 6 years 46 weeks ago
London
Joined: 2004-06-06
Posts: 15668
Points: 2806

Bad Explorer. Again.

imack, is the 460px left margin on rightcontent needed? FF doesn't seem to think so. The IE6 problem looks like a classic case of margins/padding but IMHO and not wishing to cause any offence your code is geting far too complicated for what is a fairly straight forward layout, you seem to be attempting to support every browser version that has ever existed( IE4?) and I would have thought it's just going to cause problems trying to figure out what's doing what; at this stage it's very hard to offer advice as I'm not sure of the overall ramifications.
The idea that we should support as many legasy browsers as possible just leads users of these browsers to think that nothing is wrong and that there is no need to upgrade. It's time they were made to understand that their browsers don't work to standards and that they need to upgrade which is a view I know that Zeldman holds, we actualy contribute to the fiasco that is cross browser support and ought to make a stance on only supporting major browser versions, ignore the v4s and defunct mac IE5s we need to be cruel to be kind.
Sorry I realise this isn't much help with the problem or your deadline

Hugo.

Before you make your first post it is vital that you READ THE POSTING GUIDELINES!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please post ALL your code - both CSS & HTML - in [code] tags
Please validate and ensure you have included a full Doctype before posting.
Why validate? Read Me

imack
Offline
Regular
Oslo
Last seen: 17 years 10 weeks ago
Oslo
Timezone: GMT+2
Joined: 2004-09-15
Posts: 13
Points: 0

Bad Explorer. Again.

Hugo: I totally agree with you on the antique browsers issue. I still haven't made many css-only sites, and this was (started with) an effort to make everything work. But I've tried to gap over to much. I've allready come to the conclusion to make an less complicated code, and will try that now.

It would be soooo nice if everybody used the latest browsers, and stayed of Explorer. But reality isn't like that. Everytime I speak to people who aren't to computer-savvy (there's alot of them) they are surprised to learn there are alternatives to their default browser. Or even that 'that program with internet' is called a browser. Just a little sidenote there. But I'm gonna leave the browser warning for people with old browsers. I think I'll use it alot in the future too.

And I'll look into the 460px left margin. Wink