Tue, 2009-11-17 13:43
Could you review our site here: Dynamic50 Boutique Web Development.
We are using css sprites and I really like the calendar on the blog here: Dynamic50 Blog which is all done using CSS.
We are a Boutique web development company specialising in Ruby on Rails, based in London, UK
Tue, 2009-11-17 15:40
#1
1. Most of validates!! not
1. Most of validates!! not blog
2. Is this a brand new site? Why the use of transitional DOCTYPE?
3. Your .sub-nav is taking up more space then your top lvl nav, including the arrow thingy. Not sure I'd have it take up so much real estate.
4. good use of image replacement
5. Mostly everything is fluid (em-based) but your navigation. Why not nav also? Looks funky when you text increase when everything works and moves nicely, except the nav.
6. I love the color scheme. It offers very pleasing contrast. not too much, not too little.
7. the overall design and layout of the site, along with colors and type, is easy to scan, making it very easy to understand,read, and navigate.
8. good use of heading tags!
First basic few steps in building a webpage
1. Gather and collect content.
2. Organize the content into meaningful semantic valid HTML
3. Design the prototype
4. Style using CSS
Sun, 2009-12-06 20:13
#2
Pretty Good.
Pretty Good. The one thing that got me was the over-excessively large heading tags. We are not blind, try using pictures or something in the header along with the names.
Mon, 2009-12-07 02:37
#3
twasik4 wrote: We are not
We are not blind
I don't think you should be speaking for everyone on this forum. There's probably plenty of people with poorer eyesight.
Me, personally, I don't like how all the headings have boxes around them. There's just too many big rectangles everywhere. The lack of spacing in the boxes between the text on the blog pages also doesn't look too good.
Tue, 2009-12-15 14:08
#4
i really liked ur site
sincere efforts. but improve portfolio with proper links.