Please critique power bit web design

rmfred
avatar
rank Elder

Elder


Posts: 1045
Joined: 2004-01-31
Location: Rock Springs, WY

Your thoughts, ideas, suggestions are needed for this site... be as brutal as necessary
http://www.powerbitwebdesign.com

www.powerbitwebdesign.com Powerbit your custom web design company

Triumph
Triumph's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 5286
Joined: 2005-02-03
Location: Pennsyltucky, USA

Beautiful. Nice work.

Beautiful. Nice work.

roytheboy
roytheboy's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 2320
Joined: 2004-09-18
Location: Kent, UK

A very nice piece of

A very nice piece of artistic, semantic and CSS-structural work - very nice indeed Smiling Glad to see you've stuck to 800pix wide.

A few constructive criticisms at first glance are:

1. if one increases the text size of the home page (because the default size is a little small on a high-res monitor), the blue text falls over the blue pictorial background, rendering it almost unreadable.

2. The websites shown in your portfolio do not include links to the sites. Hyperlinks are one of the biggest advantages to using the web for promotion.

3. The 'call to action' is almost non-existent - for example I'm on a page showing a website and I like what I see; I want to get in touch but where do I go to find you? 'Contact Us' is the last link under 'Ideologies'. Not very obvious. Show your phone number on every page.

4. What country are you in? ...Loveland, CO 80537 ...where's that? USA? Australia? Canada? The Moon? (and no, dot-com is not an American suffix)

5. Is the business name Power Bit or New Man Studios? Why confuse people.

6. 'creating powerful expressions' ...it's cheesy and meaningless. Replace it with a contact number.

Life's a b*tch and then you die!

rmfred
rmfred's picture
rank Elder

Elder


Posts: 1045
Joined: 2004-01-31
Location: Rock Springs, WY

Very salient points, I'll

Very salient points, I'll pass them on to the person who wrote the content. Please explain the comment on sticking to 800px wide, I'm curious.
Thank you roy and triumph

www.powerbitwebdesign.com Powerbit your custom web design company

roytheboy
roytheboy's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 2320
Joined: 2004-09-18
Location: Kent, UK

Most people design their

Most people design their sites so that they fit within an 800px browser window, but some, seeing that large monitors are becoming more popular, go for a wider fixed width. This aggravates people like me who have large monitors but who set their browser window to 800px in order to fit other things on the screen at the same time. Hence I am pleased that you did not fall into the trap of going for > 800px.

Life's a b*tch and then you die!

rmfred
rmfred's picture
rank Elder

Elder


Posts: 1045
Joined: 2004-01-31
Location: Rock Springs, WY

roytheboy wrote:Most people

roytheboy wrote:
Most people design their sites so that they fit within an 800px browser window, but some, seeing that large monitors are becoming more popular, go for a wider fixed width. This aggravates people like me who have large monitors but who set their browser window to 800px in order to fit other things on the screen at the same time. Hence I am pleased that you did not fall into the trap of going for > 800px.

Thanks for the explanation... I tend to do exactly the same thing as you, I have a 21" monitor... I'm starting to think that the old "770px" wide site "could" be expanded to "800" and there would be only a "minimal" horz scroll for those at 800... what do you think?

www.powerbitwebdesign.com Powerbit your custom web design company

Triumph
Triumph's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 5286
Joined: 2005-02-03
Location: Pennsyltucky, USA

rmfred wrote:... Thanks for

rmfred wrote:
... Thanks for the explanation... I tend to do exactly the same thing as you, I have a 21" monitor... I'm starting to think that the old "770px" wide site "could" be expanded to "800" and there would be only a "minimal" horz scroll for those at 800... what do you think?

30px isn't going to make that much of a difference is it? Smiling

roytheboy
roytheboy's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 2320
Joined: 2004-09-18
Location: Kent, UK

I'm okay with anything up to

I'm okay with anything up to about 900px but there are still lots of people out there in interwebland who either don't know how to change their monitors to more than 800px resolution, or don't want to. Thus I tend to stick to 770px as a maximum fixed width for commercial sites.

Life's a b*tch and then you die!

webchalkboard
webchalkboard's picture
rank newbie

newbie


Posts: 4
Joined: 2007-11-05
Location: Bristol

yeah it looks ok. Personally

yeah it looks ok. Personally I think it's a little dark and the beveling makes it look a little dated... It it was me I'd probably make the bevel less and try and introduce slightly lighter colours, or atleast maybe pad things out a bit to give the design room to breath, but I'm not designer.

roytheboy
roytheboy's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 2320
Joined: 2004-09-18
Location: Kent, UK

I use beveling graphic

I use beveling graphic effects a lot. Is this now dated? Does anyone else feel this way? ...serious question Smiling

Life's a b*tch and then you die!

mihirc
mihirc's picture
rank Leader

Leader


Posts: 570
Joined: 2007-05-09
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India

I like the site very

I like the site very much.

I just noticed that when you go to Passion and hover on portfolio option, the mouse pointer turns to a editing one. I think it is because of the SuckerFish Menu you have implemented, cause it doesnt do so on any other links.

Otherwise, lovely site.

mihir Smiling

Deuce
Deuce's picture
rank Elder

Elder


Posts: 1672
Joined: 2005-11-20
Location: STL

roytheboy wrote:I use

roytheboy wrote:
I use beveling graphic effects a lot. Is this now dated? Does anyone else feel this way? ...serious question Smiling

roy, you're so old you INVENTED the bevel! Sticking out tongue

Triumph
Triumph's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 5286
Joined: 2005-02-03
Location: Pennsyltucky, USA

roytheboy wrote:I use

roytheboy wrote:
I use beveling graphic effects a lot. Is this now dated? Does anyone else feel this way? ...serious question Smiling

Anything done well is never out of style. Anything done to be in style is never done well.

Uh. Puzzled Let's go with that.

roytheboy
roytheboy's picture
rank Moderator

Moderator


Posts: 2320
Joined: 2004-09-18
Location: Kent, UK

Deuce wrote:roy, you're so

Deuce wrote:
roy, you're so old you INVENTED the bevel! Sticking out tongue

Well it's true that I used to manually create bevel and drop-shadow effects with PhotoShop in the days of floppy disks when most designers were still using CS10, Rotring pens and cow-gum (I've still got all my old kit), and auto-effects were the stuff of dreams, but I'm still interested to know if graphic bevelling such as is used on the OP's site is generally considered to be 'dated' Smiling

Life's a b*tch and then you die!